It’s THE RULE OF LAW for everybody BUT for Judges determining its meaning?
John Baptist Alberdi (Author of Argentine Constitution knew better!. He included into The Constitution his Article 29 (I do mention Art. 29 as “The Curse of Alberdi to the Infamous Traitors to The Homeland” (La Maldicion de Alberdi a Los Infames Traidores a La Patria) – Is that too Harsh, Rough, Insolent Language? … Well It is in The Constitution!, and it is not strong enough to avoid violations to The Constitution! BUT at least let us -(plain and simple citizens)- qualified some judges as: “Infamous traitors to The Nation”
Art 29 Argentine Constitution:
(Original in Spanish)Art.29 CN-1853 El Congreso no puede conceder al Ejecutivo Nacional, ni las Legislaturas Provinciales a los Gobernadores de Provincia facultades extraordinarias, ni la suma del poder público, ni otorgarles sumisiones y supremacías por las que la vida, el honor o las fortunas de los argentinos queden a merced de gobiernos o persona alguna. Actos de esta naturaleza llevan consigo una nulidad insanable, y sujetarán a los que los formulen, consientan o firmen, a la responsabilidad y pena de los infames traidores a la Patria.
|–(Translated to English)Art.29. CN-1853 Congress can not grant to the National Executive, nor the Provincial Legislatures, to Provincial Governors, extraordinary powers or the sum of public power, neither prerogatives nor special privileges in order to put the life, honor or wealth of argentines to the mercy of government, neither any person whatsoever. Acts of this nature imply absolute nullity, are utterly useless, and condemn to those who formulate, consent or endorse it, the responsibility and punishment of infamous traitors to The Homeland.|
|American Jurisprudence as Sausage-Making: Who Interprets the Constitution? Posted: 21 Jun 2013 02:51 PM PDT
Doug Bandow (CATO Institute)
The Supreme Court is finishing up its latest term, saving its most controversial decisions for last. Americans venerate the Constitution, but judges determine its meaning.
Unfortunately, the result of the judicial process vindicates German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, who famously said that no one should see his sausages or his laws being made. As I point out in my latest Forbes online column, much of the Constitution is treated like an antique wall decoration: although the federal government is supposed to have only limited, enumerated powers, today it pretty much does whatever it wants.
Unfortunately, there may be no way to avoid judicial rulemaking. Louis Fisher of the Library of Congress argued: “Being ‘ultimate interpreter,’ however, is not the same as being exclusive interpreter.”
It seems obvious that if you take an oath to support the Constitution, you shouldn’t act in ways that violate the law. Former congressman and judge Abner Mikva argued that a failure by Congress to consider constitutionality “is both an abdication of its role as a constitutional guardian and an abnegation of its duty of responsible lawmaker.”
Still, the judiciary long has had the final say. But that actually is supposed to limit government and protect liberty. As I wrote on Forbes online:
Unfortunately, too many judges no longer really “interpret” the Constitution. That is why Madison’s “few and defined” powers for the national government have become “everything and unlimited. Basically, legislative and executive branch officials act however they like, subject only to judges, who decide however they like. It is government by zeitgeist—if it feels good, do it.
That means the rest of us need to work extra hard to “defend and support” the Constitution. It ain’t much of a bulwark for liberty these days, but it really is about all we have.
- Constitutional Limits on the Executive Branch (grumpyelder.com)
- NSA Leaks Threaten Constitutional Self-Government (Guest Vocie) (themoderatevoice.com)
- The Executive Branch: A Modern Day Mammoth (necessaryandpropergovt.wordpress.com)
- Treaties Do Not Supersede the Constitution (fromthetrenchesworldreport.com)
- The secret history of the Bill of Rights (salon.com)
- Zambians eager for new Constitution (times.co.zm)
- Why States Must Nullify Unconstitutional Acts of Congress: Instructions from Hamilton, Madison, & Jefferson (freedomoutpost.com)
- Judge Napolitano To FBI Director: They Cut As Many Holes in the Constitution As They Want (dprogram.net)